Some say Embrace Change, Change is good right? Why is it that so
many people in companies fight it with their last dying breath? Those
that fight are doing it for very simple reasons that make perfect sense
to me anyways, because we all do it. You see people are constantly
learning, obsorbing information from experiences around them,
interactions with people, groups, things, etc... Now when a change
occurs in their life or in this case in their job, when this happens
for the first time we are fine with it, things change around us
constantly and we adapt. But what happens when a change occurs and it
just doesnt go very smoothly? Well in a company, this is bad plain and
simple.
When change occurs in a company, especially big strategy changes and
this change is managed poorly people learn from this. They decide
right off the bat to be critical and as soon as the change starts
making their working lives miserable they fight it and if the change
has already occured, the next time change happens in the working place
they become extremely adverse to any change, overly critical and darn
right resistant. That's right resistant -- and who could blame them?
If change is managed poorly in any company (big/med/small) it affects
more than the people driving the change, it tarnishes the employees
trust in the idea that change is good and should be embraced when change is managed poorly. So how
do you avoid this issue or even deal with an environment/company that
has a sour taste in it's mouth from a poorly managed/implemented
change? You apply Change Management principles, yes there is such a
thing.
I managed to plow through a very long book, "Diffusion of Innovations" by Everett
M. Rogers (no relation). In this book Rogers talks about getting an
idea, technology or any new thing really diffused or accepted by a
particular group of people. This group could be an organization, a
social group, a customer, a client, your mom and dad... it could be
anyone!
Read more...